Origins and Background
In the grand tapestry of Indian history, the Maurya dynasty finds its roots in the remarkable tale of Chandragupta Maurya. Born into humble beginnings, his origins remain a topic of debate.
According to Brahmanical tradition, he was the son of Mura, a Sudra woman, serving in the court of the Nandas. However, Buddhist sources suggest he hailed from a Kshatriya clan called the Mauryas from the Gorakhpur region.
The Overthrow of the Nandas
With destiny guiding his path, Chandragupta, alongside the brilliant Chanakya (Kautilya), orchestrated the downfall of the mighty Nanda dynasty. Seizing power, he laid the foundation for the Maurya empire.
His ambitions extended beyond Magadha. He liberated north-western India from Seleucus, the ruler of territories west of the Indus. In a diplomatic move, a peace treaty was signed where Seleucus ceded eastern Afghanistan, Baluchistan, and the region west of the Indus in exchange for 500 mighty war elephants.
Empire Expansion
Under Chandragupta’s leadership, the Mauryan empire flourished, spanning Bihar, Orissa, Bengal, western and north-western India, and the Deccan.
The Mauryas ruled over nearly the entire subcontinent, except for Kerala, Tamil Nadu, and parts of north-eastern India. Their dominion even encompassed regions beyond those ruled by the British centuries later.
Administrative Structure
The vast empire was meticulously divided into provinces, each overseen by a prince from the royal lineage.
These provinces were further subdivided into smaller administrative units, with Pataliputra, Kausambi, Ujjain, and Taxila emerging as major centers of governance.
City Administration
Pataliputra, the heart of the empire, functioned under the administration of six committees, each comprising five members.
These committees ensured order by managing sanitation, foreign affairs, birth and death records, weights and measures, and other crucial civic duties.
Central Government and Military
The central administration maintained an intricate system of departments regulating social and economic affairs near the capital.
Chandragupta commanded a formidable army, its various divisions assigned to specialized committees ensuring military dominance.
Title | Role |
---|---|
Sitadhyaksha | Supervised agriculture |
Bandhanagaradhyaksha | Oversaw the jail system |
Pautavadhyaksha | Superintendent of weights and measures |
Panyadhyaksha | In charge of trade and commerce |
Lohadhyaksha, Sauvarnika | Supervised goods manufactured in centers |
Dandapala | Head of Police |
Nava Adhyaksha | Superintendent of ships |
Sulkaadhyaksha | Collector of tolls |
Annapala | Head of Food Grains Department |
Durgapal | Head of Royal Fort |
Koshadhyaksha | Treasury Officer |
Akaradhyaksha | Mining Officer |
Nayaka | City Security Chief |
Vyabharika | Chief Judge |
Karmantika | Head of Industries and Factories |
Ayudhagaradhyaksha | Oversaw production and maintenance of armaments |
Swarn Adhyaksha | Officer of Gold Department |
Kupyadhyaksha | Officer of Forest |
Thus, through strategic alliances, administrative brilliance, and military prowess, Chandragupta Maurya transformed the Indian subcontinent, leaving behind an empire whose influence echoed through time.
Kingdoms tend to draw maximum profit from existing resources without restructuring access to them, while Empires require significant restructuring to meet financial needs. Imperial systems attempt to erase variations in favor of cultural and economic homogeneity, often promoting ideologies like Ashoka’s dhamma. Economic restructuring becomes crucial, focusing on resources with maximum potential, as seen in the Mauryan Empire’s extension of agriculture, mobility of labor, and expansion of commercial exchange.
Chandragupta ascended to the Nanda throne around 321 BC with guidance from Kautilya. His rise is chronicled in Buddhist and Jaina texts as well as Vishakhadatta’s play Mudrarakshasa. The origin and caste status of the Maurya family remain debated, with Buddhist texts suggesting a higher status and Brahmanical sources indicating Shudra origins.
Initially weaker than the Nandas, Chandragupta adopted a strategic approach—harassing outlying areas before moving towards the kingdom’s center. After securing the Ganges Plain, he advanced to the northwest, seizing the power vacuum left by Alexander.
Chandragupta defeated Seleucus and secured a treaty in 303 BC, acquiring Eastern Afghanistan, Baluchistan, and Makran. In return, Seleucus received 500 elephants, vital for Hellenistic military strategy. A possible marriage alliance (epigammia) may have further strengthened relations.
With control over the Indus and Ganges Plains, Chandragupta firmly established his empire, ensuring administrative and military strength.
Campaigns were motivated by diplomatic play and economic advantage. The mandala theory formalized relationships with allies and enemies. Economic gains were pursued by targeting resource-rich territories like Gandhara and Central India. Conquests provided booty and prisoners-of-war for labor.
Chandragupta, identified as Sandrocottos in Greek accounts, is said to have met Alexander. Diplomatic exchanges included envoys, gifts, and even aphrodisiacs. Megasthenes, Seleucus’s envoy, documented his observations in Indica, though its accuracy remains debated.
According to Jain tradition, Chandragupta abdicated in favor of his son Bindusara and became an ascetic. He journeyed to South India with Jaina elder Bhadrabahu, ultimately ending his life through regulated slow starvation near Shravana Belgola, Karnataka.
Known to the Greeks as Amitrochates ("destroyer of foes"), Bindusara displayed intellectual curiosity, requesting sweet wine, dried figs, and a sophist from Antiochus I. Buddhist tradition links him to the Ajivika sect, and Ashokan edicts at Sannathi in Karnataka suggest either Bindusara or Ashoka’s influence there.