North-western India had always maintained active contacts with Iran, Afghanistan, and Central Asia. In the post-Mauryan period, population movements across Central Asia had a direct impact on the political situation in northern and north-western India, particularly in the regions west of the upper Ganga and Yamuna rivers.
Since the middle of the second century BCE, regions of Central Asia and the area between the Caspian Sea and China were embroiled in conflicts among various nomadic tribes. These tribes, known as the Scythians, Sakas, Huns, and Turks, started migrating from the Steppes in search of new pasture lands after being blocked from China.
Early on, invasions such as the Achaemenid invasion and Alexander’s campaigns had opened north-western India to successive conquests. Consequently, in rapid succession:
These migrations and invasions did not stop in the early period; rather, the movement of people across the north-west frontier continued for centuries.
The Indo-Iranian borderlands' geophysical characteristics facilitated easy linkages between:
Indian rulers maintained close contact with the north-west. A notable example is Ashoka, whose bilingual inscription was found at Kandahar in Greek and Aramaic, indicating active Indo-Greek interactions.
Ashoka's references to the Yonas (Yavanas) in his empire and the five Yona rulers of West Asia, North Africa, and Greece in RE.XIII further highlight Indo-Hellenistic connections.
While the north-west was witnessing these changes, in the east, Central India and the Deccan were undergoing transitions. Here, the Mauryas were succeeded by:
Among these, the most prominent dynasties that shaped the political landscape were the Sungas, Indo-Greeks, Sakas, Parthians, and Kushanas.
Our understanding of this period is derived from multiple sources, including:
Additional sources include:
The Pali work Milinda-Panha (The Questions of Milinda) provides insights into the Yavana king Menander and the influence of Buddhism during this time.
Chinese historical chronicles contain several references to events in Central Asia, Bactria, and north-west India. Notably:
These diverse sources together help reconstruct the dynamic political, economic, and cultural landscape of north-western India during this transformative period.
The last king of the Mauryas, Brihadratha, was assassinated by Pushyamitra Sunga in 180 BCE. This event is corroborated by Bana, the court poet of Harshavardhana of Kannauj.
The Sungas were brahmanas, with several references to Sunga teachers found in Vedic texts. The Brihadaranyaka Upanishad mentions a teacher named Sungiputra. From Panini, we learn that the Sungas belonged to the Bharadvaja gotra. However, conflicting sources, including Kalidasa’s Malavikagnimitra and the Baudhayana Srauta Sutra, create uncertainty about whether Pushyamitra was of Bharadvaja gotra or from the Baimbika Kashyapa lineage. Despite these uncertainties, all sources agree that the Sungas were brahmanas.
According to the Puranas, the Sunga rule in India lasted for 112 years, with Magadha as the kingdom's nucleus. The usurpation of the Mauryan throne by Pushyamitra is recorded in both the Puranas and Banabhatta’s Harshacharita.
Pushyamitra Sunga is notable for his encounters with the Yavanas (Bactrian Greeks). According to Patanjali’s Mahabhasya (III.2.111), Greek incursions occurred during Sunga rule. This is corroborated by the Yugapurana, which states that:
The phrase “Arunòad Yavano Saketam, Arunòad Yavano Madhyamikam” confirms these events. Patanjali also notes that the Yavanas lived outside Madhyadesha, east of Adarsa. The Mahabhasya is dated to around 150 BCE.
Kalidasa’s Malavikagnimitram recounts the defeat of the Yavanas by Vasumitra, grandson of Pushyamitra. The play describes:
It is uncertain who led the Bactrian Greek army, with Menander, Demetrius, and Eucratides being possible candidates.
After Ashoka’s embrace of Dhamma and Buddhism, the Sungas are noted for reverting to Brahmanical orthodoxy. The Ayodhya inscription of Dhanadeva credits Pushyamitra Sunga with performing two Ashvamedha sacrifices.
Buddhist sources claim that Pushyamitra persecuted Buddhists. The Divyavadana describes him as a destroyer of Buddhist monasteries, particularly those built by Ashoka, and states that:
However, these accounts seem exaggerated. If the Sunga period saw the renovation of stupas and Buddhist monuments, it is unlikely that they acted aggressively against Buddhists.
Another feature of this period was that the kings assumed grandiose titles. This is in contrast to the Mauryan period when Ashoka called himself only Raja. In this period, however, we see the use of titles like Maharaja, Rajaraja, Rajati Raja, and Shaonanoshao. Vedic sacrifices like Asvamedha and Rajasuya were performed with a view to augmenting royal power.
Theoretical treatises of this period uphold the concept of divine creation or divine origin of the king. The Manusmriti explains that Prajapati (the Creator) created the king by combining the essence of divinities like Indra, Varuna, Vayu, Yama, and Agni. A similar description also appears in the Ramayana, which presents the king as someone who must not only be always obeyed but also revered (manyascha pujyascha nityada). Thus, the relationship with divinity formed a crucial aspect of the polity of the period.
The last Sunga king was Devabhuti. He was killed by his Brahmana minister Vasudeva. Thus, the Sunga line came to an end by 75 BCE. They were followed by the Kanvas, whose founding member was Vasudeva.
The Sunga rule, with its center at Pataliputra, seems to have embraced territories in the middle Ganga plain, the upper Ganga valley, and eastern Malwa. According to the Divyavadana and Taranatha’s account, it also included Jalandhara and Sakala in Punjab. Two Prakrit inscriptions at Bharhut, datable to the first century BCE, clearly refer to ‘rule of the Suga’ (Suganam raje), meaning ‘of the Sunga’ dynasty. Some of the more distant regions were probably not directly under their control and merely owed them political allegiance.
The organization of the Sunga kingdom likely varied over its 112-year rule, depending on the power and ability of the ruler at the center and the extent of the empire. Pushyamitra Sunga likely had a central administration at Pataliputra, assisted by:
Patanjali mentions a sabha convened under Pushyamitra, possibly functioning as a council of ministers or an assembly. The Malavikagnimitram mentions that Agnimitra, the Viceroy at Vidisha, was assisted by a council of ministers. The princes of royal blood were appointed as:
The Ayodhya inscription of Dhanadeva proves that one of his forefathers was the governor of Kosala and related by blood to Pushyamitra. Both Kalidasa and Patanjali mention a mantriparishad, which may have been an important element in governance.
After Pushyamitra’s demise, the Sunga kingdom weakened, and his successors may have ruled in the Vidisha area for some time. The Malavikagnimitram portrays Agnimitra as the Viceroy at Vidisha (near Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh), referring to a conflict between Pushyamitra and Yajnasena, king of Vidarbha (eastern Maharashtra). The Sungas were victorious.
The drama also describes Vasumitra’s victory over a Yavana king in an area south of the Sindhu river (possibly the Kalisindh in Madhya Pradesh or the Indus). Some members of Pushyamitra’s family may have ruled in Kosala (Uttar Pradesh). The Ayodhya inscription of Dhanadeva describes him as the lord of Kosala and the sixth in descent from Senapati Pushyamitra. Pushyamitra is praised in the inscription for having performed two horse sacrifices (dvirasvamedhayajin), which alludes to his military success. This is the first inscription on stone or metal that mentions the name of Pushyamitra, as he was previously known only from literary sources.
The Kanvas, who perhaps began their political career as subordinates of the Sungas (called Shungabhrityas in the Puranas), eventually ended Sunga rule. The last ruler, according to the Puranas, was Devabhuti (or Devabhumi). According to Bana, he was the victim of a conspiracy engineered by his brahmana minister Vasudeva and was killed by a slave girl who approached him in the guise of a queen.
Altogether, ten Sunga kings ruled for a period of 112 years from c.187 to 75 BCE.
The Sunga Empire played an important role in patronizing art. Bharhut, Bodhgaya, and Sanchi bear evidence of the patronage received from the Sunga rulers. The following structures are believed to have been built during this period:
A phenomenal spatial expansion of Buddhist monastic sites occurred from the second-first centuries BCE onwards. This period saw the flowering of visual arts, including:
A most characteristic formal quality of Sunga art is its flowing linear rhythm, which binds all isolated objects in one continuous stream of life. The following features define Sunga artistic style:
The Sunga artists showed a strong interest in the human figure. Their reliefs illustrate:
Some sculptures from Bharhut, Bodhgaya, and Sanchi represent the first organized art activity distinct from the Mauryan court art. The art of this period reflects:
Important religious developments also took place during the Sunga period. One of the most significant was Patanjali’s synthesis of the tradition of Yoga, which became the foundation of one of the major schools of thought.