The heavy-industry-led growth strategy of earlier plans assigned the public sector a dominant role across all areas of economic activity. The goal was to secure the "commanding heights" of the economy through state-led control over key sectors including monetary policy, fiscal policy, commercial policy, and industrial policy.
Investment in infrastructure was exclusively under public sector control. While this sector saw rapid growth, it failed to meet expectations due to evolving technologies and changing global economic conditions.
By the 1980s, the limitations of the public sector became evident, leading to the realization that commercialisation and private sector involvement in infrastructure was essential.
Private investment in infrastructure hinges on the commercial viability of infrastructure services. Several key factors highlight the urgency for privatisation and commercialisation:
Privatisation and commercialisation are essential strategies to meet the growing infrastructure demands of a modernising and globalising Indian economy.
The entry of private capital into the infrastructure sector is not just about simple policy changes. Several critical areas must be addressed, and a conducive environment must be created to encourage investment.
Infrastructure services should not be treated as pure public goods. Their commercialisation depends on the ability to:
Segregate payers and prevent free-riding.
Ensure excludability, which is a key factor for commercial viability.
The private sector should not only provide funds but also operate facilities efficiently and responsibly. However, key challenges include:
A long history of uneconomic pricing of services.
The continued prevalence of subsidies which hinder realistic pricing strategies.
Current methods rely heavily on plan allocations and are largely supply-driven. This results in:
Insufficient focus on actual demand and utilization of existing infrastructure.
Deviation from desired outcomes due to poor returns on investment.
Privatisation demands a demand-oriented approach, with appropriate market signals indicating future needs and returns.
Proper risk allocation is vital in infrastructure projects. Key concerns include:
Private stakeholders often attempt to shift risk to the government.
Stakeholders may also attempt to shift risks among themselves, avoiding responsibility.
Despite private involvement, infrastructure often carries monopolistic elements that require government regulation. Moreover, limitations in financing and user fee recovery necessitate:
Direct government participation in projects.
A transparent framework to promote effective public-private partnerships (PPPs).
Many infrastructure ventures are natural monopolies due to their economies of scale. However:
They cannot be allowed to escape competition for public welfare reasons.
Healthy and guided competition must be encouraged.
This requires a strong and effective regulatory system.