Agricultural Liberalisation, Rural Growth Challenges and Biotechnology in India
Agricultural Liberalisation, Rural Growth Challenges and Biotechnology in India
Agricultural Policy Reforms and Pricing in Post-Liberalisation India
Post-Liberalisation Challenges and the Risk of a Dual Society
Agricultural growth alone determines the fortunes of a majority of Indian farmers and helps alleviate poverty.
The neglect of public investment in rural infrastructure post-liberalisation is a key factor behind steep deceleration in agricultural growth.
Elite-centered growth policies that ignore agriculture may lead to a dual society of rich and poor.
Market-driven liberalisation tends to favor:
Wealthy farmers,
Prosperous regions, at the cost of the disadvantaged.
Peasant movements and local activists must intervene to protect the interests of small and marginal farmers during liberalisation.
Globalisation brings both opportunities and challenges. Though it offers access to global trade and growth, most Indian peasants have not benefited so far.
India possesses strong potential to become an agricultural superpower with:
Abundant sunshine,
Adequate rainfall,
Diverse agro-climatic zones, and
Rich biodiversity.
Policy focus over the last decade has been diffuse, leading to reduced investment in agriculture.
There is confusion in policy environment and uncertainty around biotechnology adoption.
A clear and science-based stance on agricultural biotechnology by the Central government is urgently required to avoid regressing into non-technological solutions.
Pricing Policy and Macro-Economic Influences
Macro-economic policies not directly targeted at agriculture can still impact production and social relations in the sector.
Movements in:
Terms of trade,
Pricing policies,
Fiscal and monetary policy,
Exchange rate and credit policy
have significant effects on Indian agriculture, especially during structural adjustment periods.
The issue of agricultural pricing has gained importance due to:
Rising political influence of powerful farm lobbies, and
Macro-economic linkages with reform programs.
Changes in fiscal, monetary, and exchange policies can:
Significantly affect agricultural price trends,
Influence other sectors through feedback loops.
A plausible pricing strategy includes:
Removing negative protection against agriculture,
Allowing staggered price increases over time.
It is vital to support vulnerable populations with safety nets during this adjustment.
Support mechanisms must include:
Increased funding for poverty alleviation,
Employment generation programs,
Strengthened Public Distribution System (PDS) targeted to specific populations.
Fiscal Policies and Institutional Support for Sustainable Agricultural Growth
Equity in Public Investment Benefits
A sustainable fiscal policy must ensure that those who benefited most from public agricultural investment contribute proportionately.
One effective approach is the phased reduction of input subsidies, particularly on fertilizers and electricity.
Failure to raise water and electricity charges to cost-recovery levels will deteriorate service delivery and harm agriculture and the nation.
Public investment, especially in irrigation infrastructure, has steadily declined.
Agricultural investment’s share in both total investment and government expenditure has fallen significantly.
Private investment has not picked up momentum, especially in low-growth regions, which cannot prosper without renewed public support.
Input Supplies and Irrigation Efficiency
Fertilizer use is regionally and crop-wise concentrated, disproportionately favoring rich farmers.
Subsidy benefits are highly skewed and must be reduced gradually.
Increasing irrigation investment is a more effective method of raising output than fertilizer subsidies.
Irrigation systems face major issues including:
Low water charge collection,
Poor maintenance, and
High establishment costs.
Improved technology is critical for output growth.
There exists a large gap between actual and potential yields due to poor adoption of best practices.
Seed quality is a key constraint—many farmers do not differentiate between "seed and grain".
Research institutes have limited seed multiplication capacity and supply quality seeds in only small quantities.
India must develop a competitive seed market by:
Expanding public sector roles, and
Encouraging private sector participation.
Shifting subsidies from other inputs to seed production may yield better outcomes.
Agricultural Credit Reforms and Accessibility
Revitalising rural credit systems is essential as moneylenders still play a large role.
Access to institutional credit by small farmers must be systematically studied and addressed.
Timely and productive credit delivery is crucial for smallholder success.
Comprehensive reform is needed across both cooperative and commercial banks.
Non-viable Regional Rural Banks (RRBs) continue to be a longstanding problem and require resolution.
Agricultural Marketing Inefficiencies and Commercialisation
Government support for marketing infrastructure is essential, as current systems are inefficient and outdated.
Price support operations are focused on wheat and rice, but often do not reach deficit States.
Market interventions exist for sugar and cotton but are poorly executed.
Over-commercialisation may disproportionately benefit endowment-rich regions.
Marketing structures in backward districts remain underdeveloped and non-commercial.
Understanding class relations and local marketing practices is key to effective reform.
Food Stock Operations, Technology, Sustainability, and Institutional Reform in Indian Agriculture
Food Stock Operations and Subsidy Challenges
Economic costs of food grains handled by the Food Corporation of India (FCI) have sharply increased.
This rise is due to a growing gap between economic cost and procurement prices, including higher incidental costs in procurement and distribution.
Credit subsidy to the FCI is not fully accounted for in cost structures, further complicating fiscal burdens.
Food security remains a paramount concern, making subsidy reforms politically difficult.
Restricting PDS coverage to a narrowly targeted group is essential for fiscal sustainability.
Optimal food stock levels have not been systematically calculated, and current norms may need revision.
An integrated framework is needed to reassess stock levels, procurement, and off-take policies.
Policy changes such as restricting PDS off-take must come before stock recalibration efforts.
Technology Dissemination and Sustainability Concerns
Dry land technology must be disseminated on priority, similar to past thrust missions in select crops or regions.
Challenges include poor land conditions, underdeveloped infrastructure, weak research and extension services, and limited competitiveness of dry land regions.
Investment is needed not only in technology but in removing barriers to adoption.
Growth must be sustainable over the medium and long term.
Agro-climatic Regional Planning (ACRP) is a suitable framework since dry land technologies are area-specific.
Sustainability of irrigation systems also requires emphasis, particularly in drought-prone areas.
As agriculture pursues higher growth paths, sustainability challenges will intensify.
Institutional Arrangements and Structural Reforms
Land reforms must be central to structural adjustment despite their political difficulty.
State intervention bias requires compensatory reforms, including changes in land tenure and regional agrarian structures.
Institutional lending mechanisms should be strengthened for both production and long-term investment.
Crop insurance schemes must be expanded to include remunerative cash crops for cross-subsidisation.
NAFED should be treated at par with FCI for regional coarse cereal marketing and distribution.
Special programmes are needed for:
Irrigation system maintenance
Dissemination of dry land technology on an area-specific basis
Agricultural labourers—though landless—are the backbone of rural economies.
Measures must be instituted for:
Monitoring minimum wage laws, and
Distribution of surplus land among these labourers.
Institutional reforms have recently been neglected despite their critical role.
Changes in endowments and technology are driving shifts in institutional demand that must be addressed.
Cookie Preferences
This website uses essential cookies that are necessary for its core functionality, such as security, session management, and basic accessibility. These do not store any personally identifiable information and cannot be disabled.
By clicking "Ok", you consent to the selected cookies.