After the decline of Andhra power around 225, Peninsular India experienced nearly three centuries of political uncertainty until the rise of the Chalukyas in the mid-6th century. They emerged as a dominant force, ruling vast parts of South and Central India, with their influence waxing and waning but never being completely extinguished until their final decline in the 12th century. The Chalukya dynasty had three distinct but interconnected branches that collectively ruled for nearly six centuries. The earliest, the Chalukyas of Vatapi (modern Badami), rose to power in the early 6th century and maintained control until their conclusive defeat by the Rashtrakutas in 757. Around 625, the Eastern Chalukyas separated from the primary lineage and became independent rulers of Vengi, governing until 1020, when they succumbed to external invasions. The final major branch, the Western Chalukyas, also known as the Later Chalukyas, revived the legacy of the Badami Chalukyas in the late 10th century. They ruled from Kalyani between 973 and 1200, continuing Chalukyan dominance until their eventual decline. The Chalukyas' long-lasting rule remains a remarkable achievement, making them one of the most influential dynasties in Indian history.
The history of the Chalukya Dynasty is reconstructed from multiple sources, including inscriptions, monuments, coins, literary records, and foreign accounts. The Chalukyas left behind Sanskrit and Kannada inscriptions, with around 150 discovered so far. Among them, the Aihole Prasasti, composed in 630 by Ravikirtti, provides a detailed account of the Badami Chalukyas up to the reign of Pulakesin II. Their architectural legacy is showcased in the magnificent Chalukyan monuments at Aihole, Vatapi, and Pattadakal, which highlight their cultural and religious development. These structures include grand Vaishnavite and Shaivite temples, as well as a few Jain temples. Coins provide valuable insights into the chronology and trade relations of the dynasty, though only a few Chalukya coins have been discovered. Notably, they adopted the Varaha (wild boar) crest, symbolizing their devotion to Vishnu. Despite ruling for centuries, very few compositions by Chalukya court poets have survived, though the Pampa Bharata, written in Kannada, offers details on Chalukya genealogy and culture. Foreign records also provide key historical insights. The Chinese traveler Hiuen-Tsang, who visited during the reign of Pulakesin II, praised the kingdom’s prosperity and the bravery of its army. Additionally, the Persian historian Tabari recorded diplomatic ties between Pulakesin II and Khusru Perviz II of Iran. Together, these diverse sources help paint a comprehensive picture of the Chalukya dynasty’s legacy and influence.
The origins of the Chalukyas remain debated among historians. The most accepted theory suggests that they were initially a feudatory of the early Rashtrakutas. This is supported by the Undikavatika Grant from the 6th century, which mentions Jayasimha, a military commander under the Rashtrakuta king Abhimanyu.
During the Rashtrakuta war against the Nalas and Mauryas, Jayasimha seized the opportunity to declare independence and rule over Bijapur. There is no record of a direct conflict between the Rashtrakutas and Jayasimha, supporting the idea that he took power without opposition.
The loss of the Chalukyas as a military vassal weakened the Rashtrakutas, leading to their defeat by the Nala-Maurya alliance. The theory that the Chalukyas were Kadamba feudatories is disproved by the Daulatabad Grant of Jagadekamalla, which calls Jayasimha the "destroyer of the pomp of the Kadambas."
The statement implies either that Jayasimha defended the Rashtrakutas against the Kadambas or that after declaring independence, he defeated the Kadambas in battle. He then went on to overthrow the Nalas and Mauryas.
The second known ruler of the Chalukya dynasty was Ranaraga, mentioned in several texts.
The rise of the Chalukya Dynasty began with Pulakesin I, the eldest son of Ranaraga, who assumed power in 540 CE. His name, meaning "the Great Lion" in Sanskrit, reflected his ambition and military prowess. He adopted exalted titles like Sriprithvivallabha and Maharaja, equating himself to Lord Vishnu. His most significant achievement was shifting the capital to Vatapi, strategically located near the Malaprabha River. To assert his dominance, he performed the Aswamedha Sacrifice. His reign, evidenced by rock inscriptions in Badami, marked the beginning of detailed Chalukya records. He left a stable kingdom to his sons, Kirtivarman I and Mangalesa. Kirtivarman I, his elder son and commander-in-chief, ascended the throne around 566-567 CE. Known as Kirtiraja or Katti-arasa in Kannada, he focused on consolidation and military expansion. The Mahakuta Pillar inscriptions credit him with victories over the Cheras in Malabar. By the end of his reign, the Chalukya kingdom stretched from Konkan to Andhra. His younger brother, Mangalesa, initially ruled as a regent in 591 CE but later declared himself king, attempting to alter the succession. He is known for his military conquests, including the defeat of the Kalachuris and annexation of Revatidvipa (modern Goa) through naval warfare. His ambitions led to a fratricidal war with his nephew, Pulakesin II, which resulted in his downfall. Pulakesin II emerged as the undisputed ruler, elevating the Chalukya Empire to its peak. Under him, the Chalukyas dominated the Deccan. While the dynasty followed Brahminical Hinduism, it was largely tolerant of other religions, though Buddhism declined due to a lack of patronage. The groundwork laid by his predecessors enabled Pulakesin II to build a magnificent and enduring Chalukya Empire.
Mangalesa, the regent turned king, refused to hand over power to Pulakesin II upon reaching the rightful age for coronation.
As a result, Pulakesin II was forced to leave the court of Badami.
With the help of loyal friends, he gathered power and an army outside the capital.
At an opportune moment, he launched a revolt against his uncle.
During the Civil War, Mangalesa was defeated and killed.
It is certain that Pulakesin II was formally crowned as the king almost immediately after his victory.
However, there is some debate regarding the exact date of Mangalesa’s defeat and Pulakesin’s ascension to the throne.
Later evidence suggests that the coronation took place between January and July 610 CE.
The Civil War shook the foundations of the young kingdom.
It also emboldened Mangalesa’s supporters and other disgruntled elements within the kingdom.
The kingdom was surrounded by hostile adversaries, which was a common state of diplomatic relations in medieval times.
The era was filled with ambitious and opportunistic rulers, constantly seeking to exploit political instability.
Pulakesin II devoted the next 20 years to a career of aggressive military annexation.
Initially, his focus was on defending his fledgling kingdom.
Later, he aimed to enhance its stature and consolidate his power.
[There is no better proof that an aggressive policy is the best form of defence than the demonstrated rise of Pulakesin II and the consolidation and subsequent growth of his once fractured kingdom.]
Pulakesin’s rule has been chronicled in a large number of sources. These include:
Charters that mark an eventful career.
Undated records and temple inscriptions.
Information from the records of both allies and adversaries.
For ease of understanding, the Charters can be listed chronologically in the order of the regnal year of Pulakesin II in which they were issued.
1st Year - Yekkeri Rock Inscription, where the language is similar to earlier Gupta inscriptions.
3rd Year - Hyderabad Copper Plates, dated to 612 CE, which fixes Pulakesin’s coronation date as 610 CE.
5th Year - Kandalgoan Copper Plate that celebrates the grant of Pirigipa Village in Revatidvipa (Goa) by the king.
8th Year - Maruthuru Grant which records the occupation of Pishtapura.
8th Year - Satara Grant of Vishnuvardhana (Pulakesin’s brother), who had earlier been declared the Yuvaraja (Crown Prince) and appointed Governor.
There is a gap of 12 years from the Satara Grant to the next charter/inscription, which is unusual given Pulakesin's prolific record-keeping.
20th Year - Lohner Inscription (Nasik district), reliably dated to 630 CE. This inscription is an order to the ‘Rajyasamata(s)’ (administrative officers) to register the king’s gift of Goviyanaka Village to the Brahman Dama Dikshita.
21st Year - Kopparam Plates, recording the gift of another village to a Brahman belonging to Karmarashtra.
24th Year - Aihole Prasasti. This record, dated to 634 CE, was written by Ravikirtti, the court poet. It commemorates the consecration of a newly built temple to Jinendra and provides an invaluable chronological record of Pulakesin’s military exploits and those of his ancestors.
The Tummayanuru Grant provides one of the earliest references to Pulakesin as ‘Parameswara’.
A number of Copper Plates discovered at Chiplun and Nerur mention land grants, though some may be spurious.
Undated stone inscriptions at Badami and Hirebidri (Dharwar) belong to Pulakesin’s reign.
The Peddvadaguru Isvara Temple inscription mentions Pulakesin’s subjugation of Ranvikrama, possibly a Bana king, though it lacks a specific date.
The Chalukyas of Kalyani, a later dynasty descended from the Badami Chalukyas, recorded Pulakesin’s military exploits. However, their accounts might be embellished, raising some doubts about their full authenticity.
The Pallavas of Kanchi, traditional adversaries of the Chalukyas, also recorded Pulakesin’s victories. These accounts corroborate details from Chalukyan chronicles, lending credibility to the historical record.
The Chinese pilgrim-traveler Hieun Tsang provides a graphic description of the famous Pulakesin-Harshavardhana battle.
Hieun Tsang also gives detailed information about the general state of affairs in the Chalukya kingdom during his visit.
With the conquest of the Vishnukundin kingdom, the buffer between the Chalukyas and the Pallavas, the emerging power in the Peninsula, vanished.
The Aihole Prasasti unequivocally mentions the growing power of the Pallavas and alludes to the mounting rivalry between the two dynasties.
The reason for the Chalukya-Pallava rivalry is often mentioned as being obscure, but in reality, it was a struggle for political supremacy.
Around 618-619, Pulakesin II pushed the Pallavas into their capital Kanchipura and vanquished Mahendravarman I.
Instead of annexation, Pulakesin ensured the subjugation of the Pallavas and extended his campaign as far as the River Kavery.
This strategy aligned with the Mandala Theory of envelopment in practical diplomacy.
After Pulakesin returned to Badami, the Pallavas rapidly regained their lost authority.
A few years later, Narasimhavarman ascended the Pallava throne and aimed to regain lost territories.
Pulakesin initiated another military expedition, leading to a series of battles at Pariyala, Suramara, and Manimangala, all in Pallava territory.
The Pallavas gradually pushed back the Chalukyas, leading to an eventual reversal of fortunes.
With the support of Southern allies, Narasimhavarman launched a counter-campaign into Chalukya territory.
The Pallavas won multiple battles and advanced towards Badami.
The exact date of the final battle remains unknown, but it is clear that Pulakesin II was killed, and Badami was captured.
The Pallava general, Siruthodar Paranjoti, led the successful attack.
A Ceylonese prince, Manivarman, also aided the Pallavas, reinforcing the connection between the Peninsula and Ceylon.
The victory earned Narasimhavarman the title of "VatapiKonda" (Victor of Vatapi).
An inscription on the Mallikarjun Temple at Badami confirms the Pallava victory and the capture and burning of the capital.
The Chalukya Empire faced immediate strife and decline after the sacking of Badami.
Pulakesin II, once a conqueror of Harshavardhana and the mightiest ruler of the Chalukyas, vanished from historical records.
Failure is never lauded—a king and a beggar become equal in the face of death.