The Kakatiyas were originally believed to belong to the Ratta or Rashtrakuta family, making them Chaturdhakulajas or Sudras. They claimed lineage from the Durjaya family, with their distant ancestor Karikalachola founding Kakatipura. This indigenous Andhra dynasty ruled Andhradesa from the 10th century AD to the first quarter of the 14th century AD. Even today, their legacy remains influential in shaping the cultural and political identity of the Telugu-speaking region.
The Bayyaram tank epigraph confirms that Venna was the earliest known member of the family, ruling from Kakati. Hence, his descendants were called the Kakatiyas. Multiple inscriptions describe them as the Lords of Kakatipura, suggesting that Kakati was a significant town from which their name originated.
According to the literary text Prataparudrayasobhushana by Vidyanatha, the Kakatiyas were devotees of the goddess Kakati, from whom they derived their name. Additionally, they are known as worshippers of Svayambhudeva, a form of Lord Siva.
The earliest significant figure of the Kakatiya dynasty was Gundaya Rashtrakuta. His name is recorded in the Mangallu inscription of Danarnava. Gundaya, a commander under Rashtrakuta Krishna II, died heroically in battle against the Eastern Chalukyas.
For his valor, Krishna II rewarded Gundaya’s son, Ereya, with the governorship of the Korivi region. This marked the family's elevated status and set the foundation for their future rule.
During the 9th and 10th centuries, the Kakatiyas served as subordinates of the Rashtrakutas. After the downfall of the Rashtrakutas, they became feudatories or Mahamandalesvaras under the Western Chalukyas of Kalyani. Prominent Kakatiya rulers, including Beta I, Prola I, Beta II, and Prola II, served under Western Chalukyan kings like Somesvara I, Vikramaditya VI, Somesvara III, and Jagadekamalla II.
Following the fall of the Western Chalukyas during the reign of Tailapa III, Rudradeva declared independence in AD 1158, marking the start of the Kakatiya rule as a sovereign power. Rudradeva, the son of Prola II, ruled from AD 1158 to 1195 and is considered the founder of the Kakatiya lineage.
The Hanumakonda epigraph dated AD 1162 describes his victories over neighboring rulers and his expansion into coastal Andhra by defeating the Velanaticholas. Despite his military success, he faced defeat by the Yadavas of Devagiri, as recorded in Jalhana’s Suktimuktavali and Hemadri’s Vratakhanda.
As Rudradeva had no children, his brother Mahadeva succeeded him, ruling from AD 1195 to 1198-99. Mahadeva faced defeat and death in battle against the Yadava king Jaitugi, leading to the capture of his son Ganapatideva by the Yadavas. During this period of political instability, the commander-in-chief Recharla Rudra played a crucial role in maintaining the kingdom until Ganapatideva was eventually released from captivity.
Ganapatideva ruled from AD 1199 to 1262. Despite early challenges, his reign is marked as a golden era for the Kakatiyas. He expanded the kingdom by defeating the Velanati chief Prithviswera and supporting Manumasiddhi to reclaim the throne of Nellore. However, his attempts to conquer Kalinga were unsuccessful. Additionally, his defense of Nellore against Jatavarma Sundara Pandya failed, leading to the latter’s coronation at Nellore and Kanchi.
Ganapatideva’s significant achievement was the unification of Telugu-speaking regions and the shifting of the capital from Hanumankonda to Warangal.
With no male heir, Ganapatideva appointed his eldest daughter, Rudramadevi, as his co-regent from AD 1260 to 1262. She officially ascended the throne in AD 1262 and ruled until AD 1289, becoming the first woman ruler of the Andhra region. Rudramadevi successfully repelled the Yadava attacks and extended her control up to Devagiri, as recorded in the Bidar epigraph.
According to the Chandupatla epigraph, Rudramadevi and her general Mallikarjuna died in battle against the rebel leader Kayasta Ambadeva.
Rudramadevi was succeeded by her grandson, Prataparudradeva, who ruled from AD 1289 to 1323. He defeated Kayashta Ambadeva and the Yadava allies, restoring the prestige of the Kakatiyas. However, during his reign, the Delhi Sultans, including Alauddin Khilji and later Muhammad bin Tughluq, launched invasions into South India. In AD 1323, Prataparudra faced defeat against the armies of Muhammad bin Tughluq, leading to the end of the Kakatiya dynasty.
The Kakatiya polity was primarily a monarchical system. While the ruler held supreme authority, the system was not an absolute autocracy. The succession generally followed the law of primogeniture, with exceptions like the notable reign of Rudramadevi.
The Kakatiya polity demonstrated a significant level of decentralization. While rulers maintained central authority, they shared power with their subordinates. The subordinates had autonomy in governance, except in military matters. P.V. Prabrahma Sastry remarked that this decentralization prevented excessive concentration of power.
Some scholars view the Kakatiya polity as a feudal system characterized by a warrior elite and agrarian dependence. Others, like Burton Stein, proposed the concept of a segmentary state. However, Cynthia Talbot rejected the segmentary model, considering Telangana a shatter region on the borders of South India.
Cynthia Talbot suggested that the Kakatiya state is best understood as a fluctuating political network consisting of interconnected rulers and subordinates. Power relations were established through personal loyalties, resembling Weber’s patrimonial model.
The Kakatiya rulers were assisted by a council of ministers and various officials at both the central and provincial levels. The kingdom was divided into territorial units including Mandala, Nadu, Sthala, Seema, and Bhumi, each governed by loyal officials.
The military system was founded on the Nayamkara system. Under this system, Nayaks were granted fiefs (jagirs) in exchange for maintaining military forces. The size of the forces, including soldiers, horses, and elephants, depended on the fief’s value.
In addition to the Nayak forces, the Kakatiyas maintained a standing army led by commanders directly responsible to the ruler.
Forts were critical to the military organization. Different types of forts mentioned in epigraphs include:
The Kakatiyas rapidly expanded their territory through strategic military campaigns. Cynthia Talbot emphasized their practice of patronizing warrior chiefs and fostering a martial ethos, which solidified their military strength.