UPSS (Usual Principal + Subsidiary Status) adds those who worked intermittently to UPS-employed.
CWS employment includes people employed for at least one hour during the reference week.
CDS employment measures employment in terms of person-days and reflects labour force utilisation.
CDS is the most accurate for estimating real employment levels, while the other methods may slightly overestimate due to broader definitions.
Relationship Between Employment and GDP
Employment generation depends on the volume and composition of economic activity in an economy.
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) represents the total output of goods and services.
Levels of employment are influenced by the size and structure of GDP.
Factors Affecting Employment Levels
Availability of capital for production
Skills and expertise of the labour force
The interaction of labour and capital in production
Influence of material, financial, and human capital, technology, labour productivity, and government policies
Labour Force and Workforce Participation Rates
Definitions
Labour Force includes both the employed and unemployed population willing to work.
Labour Force Participation Rate (LFPR) is the percentage of the population actively engaged in or seeking work.
Work Participation Rate (WPR) refers to the percentage of the labour force that is actually working.
The gap between labour force growth and employment growth indicates trends in unemployment.
Trends in Male and Female Participation
Male participation has consistently remained higher than female participation in both labour force and workforce (1983–2009-10).
Using the UPSS criterion, LFPR was:
42.9% in 1983
42.3% in 1993-94
43.0% in 2004-05
Female participation rates in those years were:
29.8%, 29.0%, and 29.4% respectively
Using the UPS criterion, female LFPR was even lower:
21.1% in 1993-94
22.4% in 2004-05
In 2004-05, male UPS rate was 55.1% and UPSS rate was 55.9%, while corresponding female rates were 22.4% and 29.4% respectively (India Labour and Employment Report, 2012).
Rural and Urban Comparisons
Female participation in rural areas is higher than in urban areas.
Urban male participation was higher than rural males in 1999-2000, 2004-05, and 2009-10.
LFPR for rural males increased slightly in 2009-10 vs. 2004-05, while it declined for urban males.
NSSO’s 66th round revealed a significant drop in rural female work participation between 2004-05 and 2009-10:
UPS employment: 20%
UPSS employment: 26%
In urban areas, female UPS employment dropped from 13.5% to < 12%, and UPSS from ~17% to < 14% (Mazumdar, 2011).
Reasons for Decline in Female Participation
Social conservatism leading to women withdrawing from the labour market
Increased pursuit of higher education among women
Decline in employment opportunities across all age groups is a more plausible explanation
Dynamic Nature of Participation Rates
LFPR is not constant; it varies with economic, social, and cultural factors.
Women and children are more sensitive to these changes.
Poor women tend to participate more, but may withdraw as household income increases and re-enter at higher income levels or education.
Female LFPR follows a U-shaped curve with respect to per capita income (India Labour and Employment Report, 2012).
Table: Labour Force and Workforce Participation Rates (CDS basis, %)
This website uses essential cookies that are necessary for its core functionality, such as security, session management, and basic accessibility. These do not store any personally identifiable information and cannot be disabled.
By clicking "Ok", you consent to the selected cookies.
*This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. Ads are essential for this service. They cannot be disabled. Ads are required for financial support.