The Chera Dynasty ruled over parts of modern Kerala during the Sangam period. Their capital was Vanji, and their important seaports were Tondi and Musiri. The emblem of the Cheras was the Bow and Arrow.
The Chera kings were also known as “Keralaputas” (sons of Kerala).
Information about the Cheras primarily comes from the Sangam Literature, including:
The Chera Kingdom regained significance in the 9th century AD under King Alwar Kulasekhara Varman, who succeeded his father Thidaviradhan in 800 AD. He established the Second Chera Kingdom with Mahodayapuram as its capital.
Despite founding a new kingdom, his influence was limited by Aryan-Brahmin settlements and hereditary chieftains called Naduvazhis.
The Chera Kingdom thrived through trade with the Romans. Key factors contributing to their economic prosperity were:
The major seaport of Muziris housed two Roman regiments and facilitated trade in spices, ivory, timber, pearls, and gems.
The Chera architectural style followed a distinct Dravidian tradition, with octagonal or rectangular temples built using sandstone or granite. Key features included:
The Cholas were the most powerful polity in the peninsular region, with the Kaveri valley as the nucleus of their power. They succeeded in establishing a strong regional state in Tamil Nadu, which flourished during the medieval period.
The Cholas rose to prominence in the 9th century CE when Vijayalaya seized Tanjavur from a Pallava feudatory chief known as the Muttarayas. This marked the beginning of their territorial dominance. They further expanded by subduing the Pallavas and the Pandyas, securing control over the Tamil macro-region.
The Cholas traced their lineage to the Suryavamsha (Solar Dynasty). To establish their legitimacy, the Chola rulers used elaborate genealogies, incorporating mythical traditions in their inscriptions. These are prominently seen in the Tiruvalangadu Copper Plates, Leiden Plates, Anbil Plates, and the Kanyakumari Inscription of Vira Rajendra.
Chola prashastis (eulogies) were often inspired by the Itihaasa-Purana tradition, highlighting their claims to Brahmanical and Sanskritic heritage. These inscriptions served as a political tool for asserting divine legitimacy.
Chola kings conducted grand ceremonies to solidify their divine and political authority. Some of these rituals included:
Land grants were a prominent feature of the Chola administration. These grants not only rewarded Brahmanas for meritorious service but also helped convert unsettled lands into agricultural settlements. Some notable aspects include:
Chola kings often drew parallels with divine figures to strengthen their rule. For instance:
The local administration under the Cholas was a well-organized system consisting of Ur (village-level assemblies) and Nadu (regional assemblies). The administrative units were closely tied to the agrarian economy, and local governance played a significant role in resource management and land grants.
The Chola copper plate inscriptions provide valuable insights into the various administrative bodies involved in the execution of land grants and governance. These include:
The Chola local administration was based on a two-tier system:
According to historian Y. Subbarayalu, the Nadu was a prominent administrative unit that included both Brahmadeya and Vellanvagai (peasant) villages. The Nadu was not artificially created but emerged as a natural cluster of settlements in fertile areas, gradually expanding to less fertile regions.
Vellanvagai villages were primarily agricultural settlements with a hierarchical social structure. Based on epigraphic evidence and studies by historians such as N. Karashima and Subbarayalu, these villages consisted of the following groups:
The habitation areas within these villages included specific settlements for cultivators (Ur-Nattam), artisans (Kammanacceri), and laborers (Paraicceri).
The Ur played a crucial role in local governance, primarily overseeing the management of village resources. Their functions included:
Membership in the Ur assembly was primarily determined by land ownership. Members often held titles like:
There is evidence of both collective and individual land ownership in Ur villages. While some villages held land communally, inscriptions also record instances where individual members sold or transferred land. The emergence of individual holdings indicates the diversification of agrarian practices over time.
The Nadu represented a coalition of several villages, forming a larger regional unit. The governing body of the Nadu was the Nattar, composed of prominent landholders and leaders from various Urs. The Nattar assemblies often made decisions on land distribution, tax collection, and dispute resolution.
Unlike the artificially established administrative units called Valanadus during Rajaraja I's reign, the Nadus were naturally formed regional clusters. These units emerged initially in fertile zones before expanding to peripheral areas, facilitating the spread of the agrarian economy.
There are differing views among historians regarding the administrative role of Nadu. While traditional interpretations view Nadu as a state-created administrative unit, recent scholarship suggests it was a naturally evolved peasant settlement, later integrated into the Chola state system.
Key perspectives include:
During the Chola period, the Nadu was a significant administrative unit consisting of agricultural settlements. The Chola copper plates and inscriptions provide insights into the roles and responsibilities of the Nattars, who were predominantly Vellala landholders.
One notable inscription is the Kiranur inscription of 1310 CE, which refers to the 'Urom of villages' qualified for the Nadu or Vada-chiruvayil-nadu, highlighting the existence of this administrative unit.
The Nattars were the representatives of the Nadu and played a central role in village administration. Their primary functions included:
Although the Nattars operated independently in many matters, they were ultimately subject to the king’s authority.
Temples were significant landowners during the Chola period. The Nadu administration played a key role in the management of temple lands. Lands donated to temples were often tax-exempt, referred to as Nattiraiyili.
The Nadu was responsible for:
To manage tax-exempt lands, the Nadu sometimes levied special cesses or taxes, known as:
The Nadu served as the primary unit for revenue administration. Revenue collection and assessment were conducted within the Nadu, and local officials played key roles in this process.
Some important terms related to Nadu revenue administration include:
When taxes were exempted at the village level (Ur), the impact was recorded in the Nadu’s revenue registers.
While the Nattars were local representatives, the Chola state also appointed royal officials to oversee Nadu administration. Some of these officials included:
These officials ensured that the central authority of the Chola state was maintained within the Nadu, while still allowing a degree of local autonomy.
Several functionaries were appointed within the Nadu to manage specific tasks. Their designations and responsibilities included:
The Nadu Kuru is specifically mentioned in inscriptions from Kulottunga I’s reign (1116 CE) for overseeing the functioning of new Devadana (temple) lands. Nadu officials were sometimes transferred to other Nadus, reflecting their integration into the broader administrative framework of the Chola state.
Despite the autonomy enjoyed by Nattars, the Chola kings maintained control over the Nadu administration. This was reflected in the dual administrative registers:
When the king issued orders regarding temple funds, these directives were recorded in both registers, demonstrating the interconnected nature of state and local administration.
The Nadu was a critical administrative unit in the Chola state, balancing both local autonomy and centralized authority. It played a major role in:
The administrative structure of the Nadu highlights the sophistication and adaptability of the Chola governance system, which integrated local traditions into a larger state framework.
Brahmadeyas constituted the category of Brahmanas who were landholders in the agricultural tracts and who had been endowed with land (tax-free) and had organised themselves into a distinct group. Nagaram comprised traders who carried out trading and exchange activities in areas that had developed into commercial centres due to the growth of craft production and other activities carried out by artisans.
When the Cholas emerged as an important ruling power in the middle of the 9th century CE in Thanjavur, there already existed many Brahmadeyas, which were densely populated and rich tracts in the Kaveri region. The Karantai plates of Rajendra I refer to 1080 Brahmanas who inhabited Tribhuvanamahadevi Caturvedimangalam. The assembly of these Brahmanas was called Sabha or Mahasabha.
Most of the Brahmadeyas or Brahmana settlements were centred around the temple. Through the temple and the ideological focus based on the Puranas and Itihaasas, as well as the principles of Bhakti and Varnashramadharma, the differentiated society and monarchical polity were legitimized. Therefore, the kings endowed lands to Brahmanas and created Brahmadeyas as a means to legitimize their power.
The inscriptions inform us that many of the Brahmadeyas in the Chola period were Taniyur (separate villages) in a Nadu. They had a separate administrative system for revenue and justice. Many agricultural villages were clubbed together with a Taniyur, and sometimes a Taniyur was placed subordinate to a temple. Here the Mulparusai was the body that handled administrative duties.
The inscriptions describe the prerequisites for membership to the executive committee of a Sabha, including:
The Karantai plates (referring to 1080 Brahmanas) mention the existence of Brahmadeyas but do not detail how the Sabha and other committees were formed. Their origin may be attributed to Dharamashastric norms.
The Sabha and its committees played an essential role in supervising the temple lands, cattle, and other resources. Their responsibilities included:
The Sabha acted as a group, making decisions for the benefit of the organisation rather than for individuals.
The Brahmadeya settlements, where temples played a central role, gradually lost importance in the later phase of the Chola period. After the mid-11th century CE, fewer Brahmadeya tracts were established, and more temples were constructed or renovated. The Mahasabha, in some instances, faced financial difficulties and had to rely on the income from neighbouring villages when unable to repay debts owed to temples.
The Nagaram settlement was a commercial tract where traders and artisans resided. An inscription from 1036 CE in Chidambaram mentions the distinction between non-Brahmana inhabitants of superior status (Kudiga) and those of inferior status (Kil Kalanai).
The Kudiga group included two merchant categories:
Additionally, three other occupational groups were part of the Kudiga category:
The subordinate artisans and workers (Kil Kalanai) consisted of:
Nagarattar served as the representative body of traders. The Nagaram settlement was a distinct area, and its governing committee was called Nagaravariyam.
Nagaram held common land known as Nagarakkani, which they acquired through purchase or lease. The responsibilities of the Nagaravariyam included:
In some cases, the Nagaram settlements functioned independently of the Nadu, acting as Taniyur.
The Chola kingdom had a structured administrative system with various officials. While there is no clear evidence of a formal council of ministers, Uddan-kottam likely served that purpose. Officials were often paid through land grants and had the authority to manage and trade lands.
The administrative hierarchy had flexible roles with opportunities for upward and downward mobility. The key categories were:
However, historians suggest that these divisions are not consistently evidenced in inscriptions.
The Chola administration was organized into distinct territorial units:
Land revenue and management were crucial to the administration. Key departments and records included:
The Chola king often granted lands to Brahmanas and temples. The process involved:
Justice was primarily administered by village assemblies through the Nyayattar (judges). The central court was called the Dharmasana, presided over by Dharamasana Bhattas, who were Brahmanas proficient in law.
Offenses affecting the king or ruling dynasty were directly handled by the king. Punishments included:
Local bodies played a significant role in administration. The officer hierarchy ensured proper governance at all levels, with titles indicating their roles and responsibilities. Some officers bore titles combining their rank with the king’s name or epithet.
Rajaraja I (1001 CE) introduced an elaborate land revenue system, including the creation of Valanadus, a practice continued by later rulers. The Puravuvari Tinaikkalam (land revenue department) managed tax collection.
During Rajendra II, officers had more elaborate designations such as Puravu-vari-tinaikkala-kanakkar. Under Kulottunga I, the primary officials were:
Later, the term Variyilar became a general reference for revenue officers, who often held titles such as Udaiyan and Muvendavelan.
Titles like Udaiyan, Kilan, and Kilavan indicated land possession. Other titles included:
Merchants and artisans also held specific titles:
While no formal council of ministers is evident, key officials included:
According to historian M.G.S. Narayanan, Udan Kuttams (royal companions of honor) existed and had an Adhikari as their head.
Several levies were imposed, mainly collected in kind (paddy):
The Cholas conducted significant military campaigns:
The Chola military was well-organized with specialized units:
The Kantalur Salai was a military training institution, likely destroyed by the Cholas during their war against the Cheras.
Chiefs played an important role in governance. In the Pandyan kingdom, the chief category was Ays. The Sangam literature mentions several other chiefs:
Pallava inscriptions also mention chiefs like:
During the Chola period, the notable chiefs included:
Chiefs were granted land and collected dues in return for Padi Kaval (territorial protection). In the post-Kulottunga period, Nilamaittittu (diplomatic agreements between chiefs) were recorded.
It is difficult to determine the origin of the term 'Pandya' with complete accuracy. Various opinions exist regarding its origin, and the names of the Pandyan monarchs are mentioned in several important literary works such as:
Some historians suggest that the term may be derived from the label 'Pandava'. Another interpretation is that the Tamil word 'Pandia' means 'old country.' Additionally, the Tamil word 'Pandi' means 'bull,' symbolizing strength and masculinity. Consequently, it is argued that the Pandyan rulers adopted this title to emphasize their power. The first king to use the title 'Pandya' was Kulashekharan, and his successors continued this tradition, making the name synonymous with the dynasty.
The rule of the Pandyas can be classified into three main sections:
The early Pandyas, also known as the Pandyas of the Sangam Age, were contemporaries of the Cheras and the Cholas. These kingdoms often engaged in conflicts to establish political dominance. Following the rise of the Kalabhras, both the Pallavas and Pandyas lost their political control. However, the Pandyas regained their influence, with the Kaveri River marking the boundary between their territory and the Pallavas.
The earliest known ruler from the Pandyan dynasty was Palyagasalai Mudukudumi Peruvaludi. Another significant king was Neduncheliyan I, also known as Ayyappudai Kadantha Neduncheliyan, meaning 'the one who vanquished the Aryans.' His rule is mentioned in the Tamil literary work Silapaddikaram by Ilango Adigal. Nedunchelian II was regarded as the greatest ruler of the early Pandyas, defeating the combined forces of the Cholas and Cheras at the Battle of Talaiyalanganam.
The First Pandyan Empire was established by Kadungon in the 6th century after defeating the Kalabhras. The rulers of this empire adopted titles such as:
One notable ruler was Arikesari Maravarman, known for defeating the Cheras and imprisoning their ruler. His son, Kochadaiyan Ranadhiran, faced conflicts with the Chalukyas of Badami and the Western Gangas. His successor, Maravarman Rajsimha I, expanded the empire through battles with the Pallava ruler Nandivarman II and the Chalukyas.
The last ruler of the First Pandyan Empire was Maravarman Rajasimha III, who was defeated by the Chola king Parantaka I. The Chola ruler captured the Pandyan capital, earning the title Maduraikonda. Eventually, in the 10th century, the resurgence of the Cholas further diminished the power of the Pandyas.
Ultimately, the decline of the Pandyas was marked by the defeat of Vira Pandya by Aditya Karikala, the son of Parantaka Chola II.
Later in the 13th century, the Pandyas regained their dominance under the leadership of Maravarman Sundara Pandyan. He laid the foundation for the Second Pandyan Empire by forcing the Chola ruler Kulothunga Chola III to submit to Pandyan authority. The most influential ruler of this period was Jatavarman Sundara Pandyan, under whom the empire reached its zenith, extending its territory significantly.
The Pandyan military achieved victories in regions such as the Telugu country, Kalinga (present-day Odisha), and Ceylon. Despite assistance from the Hoysalas, the declining Chola Empire failed to resist the growing Pandyan power. Eventually, Maravarman Kulashekhara Pandyan I defeated the joint forces of Rajendra Chola III and the Hoysala ruler, effectively ending Chola rule in South India.
Following the fall of the Chola Empire, internal conflicts further weakened the Pandyan Empire. A civil war erupted between Vira Pandya and Sundara Pandya, the sons of Maravarman Kulashekhara Pandyan I. This intense rivalry accelerated the dynasty's decline, leading to political instability and loss of influence.
The political landscape of South India during the early medieval period was marked by frequent battles between the Pandyas, Pallavas, and Chalukyas. The Chalukyas of Vatapi and the Pallavas of Kanchi were particularly at odds, often contesting territories. The ambitious Pallava monarch Mahendravarman I expanded his empire up to the Krishna River, while the Chalukyan king Pulakesin II established dominance over the northern regions.
With the emergence of the Pandyan Dynasty of Madurai, a fierce triangular rivalry intensified. The Pandyas, aiming to expand their control over the Kaveri Delta, formed alliances with the Chalukyas to weaken the Pallavas. Notable rulers like Arikesari Parankusa Maravarman I allied with Vikramaditya I of the Chalukyas, targeting Pallava territories.
Pandyan rulers also launched military campaigns against neighboring kingdoms like the Cheras and initiated invasions into Ceylon. During the reign of Jayantavarman (645-670 CE), the Pandyan victories over the Cheras were commemorated by adopting the title Vanavan.
Strategic interference in Pallava politics was another tool used by the Pandyas to consolidate power. Maravarman Rajasimha I formed alliances with the Chalukyas to support rivals like Chitramaya against Pallava rulers. His repeated victories earned him the title Pallava Bhanjana (Breaker of the Pallavas).
However, Pallava monarch Nandivarman II responded to the Pandyan threat by securing matrimonial alliances, notably marrying Reva, the daughter of Chalukyan ruler Dantidurga. This strategy aimed to counterbalance the Pandyan-Chalukya coalition. Despite their efforts, the Pandyan incursions remained a significant challenge for the Pallavas.
The complex web of alliances, military campaigns, and political maneuvering among the Pandyas, Pallavas, and Chalukyas exemplifies the volatile nature of South Indian politics during this era.
The Pandyas were overthrown by the Kalabhras, leading to a period of political discontinuity known as the Kalabhra interregnum, lasting from 3rd to 7th centuries. The origin of the Kalabhras is uncertain. However, by the end of the 6th century or early 7th century, the Pandyas under Kadungon regained power, restoring their rule. The Pallavas faced a similar fate but reestablished their dominance under Simhavishnu, who founded the imperial Pallava dynasty.
The prestige of the Pallavas as an imperial power diminished when the Chalukyan ruler Vikramaditya II invaded their territory, briefly capturing Kanchipuram. Subsequently, Nandivarman III was defeated by the Pandyan ruler Shrimara Shrivallabha (815-862 CE) near Kumbakonam.
Following the death of the Pallava king, a war of succession erupted among his three sons. During this conflict, Nrupatunga lost his life. The Chola king Aditya Chola and the Pandya emperor Kamavarman defeated Aparajita, one of the Pallava brothers. The third brother submitted to the Cholas’ rule by the early 10th century, marking the end of the Pallava imperial reign.
The Pallavas faced continuous military challenges from the Chalukyas with support from the Western Gangas. Additionally, opportunistic invasions by the Pandyas, Rashtrakutas, and Cholas further weakened their hold over the region.
The Pandyan kingdom also experienced internal turmoil due to a war of succession, which eventually led to its downfall. In 1311, Malik Kafur, the military general of the Delhi Sultan Alauddin Khilji, invaded Madurai during the conflict between Vira Pandya and Sundara Pandya. Kafur’s campaign was notably profitable, reflecting the wealth of the Pandyan kingdom. However, the invasion weakened the Pandyas, enabling their feudatories to assert power independently.
The northern territories of the Pandyas fell to the Kakatiyas. The Delhi Sultanate launched two more invasions, with the final one led by Ulugh Khan (Muhammad Bin Tughlaq). During his reign (1325-1351), the Pandyan kingdom was annexed and merged into the Sultanate. However, the Sultanate's control over Madurai diminished by the end of his rule.