Loading...
Studento Logo
🗣
User Profile

Comprehensive notes on Article 13 and Judicial Review under the Indian Constitution, covering laws inconsistent with Fundamental Rights, the Kesavananda Bharati case, and Fundamental Rights of citizens and foreigners.

Article 13 and Judicial Review: Laws Inconsistent with Fundamental Rights

The Laws Inconsistent with Fundamental Rights form the backbone of constitutional governance in India, shaping how the judiciary safeguards individual liberties. Through Article 13 and the powerful doctrine of judicial review, the Constitution ensures that no legislative or executive action can curtail the essence of Fundamental Rights. This topic is immensely important for students preparing for UPSC, SSC, and other competitive exams, as it connects the legal framework with the spirit of democracy and rule of law.

Laws Inconsistent with Fundamental Rights in India and the Doctrine of Judicial Review (Article 13)

Please login to comment and rate.

🏠 📚 👨‍🎓 🧑‍🤝‍🧑 👨‍🏫 👨‍💼

📢 New Updates

Ask Studento – Search Engine
📘

Search

🛒

Cart

📺

Radio

📻

Air News

🎥

Music

📝

Notes

📰

Newspaper

🌍

Map

💻

Fullscreen

📲

App

🔔

Notifications